Mothering isn’t a science
Monday, Jun 27, 2005
There are multiple opportunities in the life of a mother to laugh. They’re just hard to see sometimes. The reason I don’t have a merry heart at times is because usually, as a mother, I’m too busy naming the mishap as a crisis, a disaster, a “hurry-and-get-me-a-mop-and-a-bottle-of-disinfectant” sort of thing.
Now, there are times when disasters really do occur, but so long as the bodies under my care are in tip-top condition and their spirits aren’t crushed, well, everything else is just blog material. You know?
Take our science experiment last week. It was a disaster, er…I mean, a great opportunity that Candid Camera missed. It had something to do with mixing cocoa powder in water, dissolving salt in water, and pouring the salt mixture through a filter into the cocoa mixture. Then tasting it.
Yeah, we didn’t get it either.
I even walked outside to where my very own rocket scientist was concocting chemical potions to ask him for his expertise in solving the mystery of the kiddie science project gone bad. He didn’t get it either.
[He protests now that I’ve written this, that he wasn’t given the benefit of full information. But since I don’t want to ruin the story, I’ll leave that out.]
In case you’re wondering, this isn’t Chem II; we’re only on third grade science. Why would I order a teacher’s manual for elementary science when there’s a rocket scientist on site? I was thinking that I wouldn’t need an answer key until fourth grade. Yeah, not until fourth grade. Furthermore, this is just icing and side stuff, as I stick to reading, writing, and arithmetic during the “regular” school year. (Frequently feeding the personal scientist his protein is even cheaper than some of these teacher manuals. Have you priced any lately?)
So, the experiment was a let down. The kitchen was a disaster, er…I mean, opportunity for a mama to show some grace and humor, as I allowed the kids to set up the experiment while I attended to the baby. There were measuring cups of every size on the counter, cocoa powder spilled on the floor, water puddles on various surfaces, and rags haphazardly positioned on other food spills. (The hard-at-work budding experimentists must have needed a few snacks as brain fuel.) So, now, the kitchen was a mess, and to top it off, we didn’t even learn anything.
Except that sometimes there are more important things to learn and be thankful for.
By the way, I’m plunking down the extra dough for the teacher’s manual next year.
8 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment

Did the resultant potion taste salty? Just wondering…
Comment by Valerie (June 27, 2005 @ 11:24 am )
Maybe you should let the rocket scientist teach science!!
Our science is playing in the backyard, growing a garden, taking walks, drawing pictures of wildlife (of all sorts!), trips to the beach… an occasional Moody Science video, some books, baking bread and brownes (see we use cocoa and salt, too, but with better results!)… who needs a teacher’s manual! At this point experiments are too messy (as you know!!)
I am feeling really gross, btw! (Thanks for asking on my blog last week.) But hopefully as I’m entering week 12 things will improve!
AND CONGRATULATIONS to your family!!! What joyful news… next year at the HSC conf. we’ll each have a new little one to meet!!
Comment by Meg (June 27, 2005 @ 12:49 pm )
We stick to the Janice Van Cleave series of science experiments. They are generally no-fail, and you can pick and choose without the burden of a whole curriculum.
Comment by Meredith (June 27, 2005 @ 1:25 pm )
Hi Amy, I’ve been away for over a week. Congratulations on your new little blessing growing inside
Love Janet.
Comment by Janet (June 27, 2005 @ 1:55 pm )
Your absolutely right, Mothering isn’t science. In my case it’s one big experiment. But as you found when cleaning up this science experiment the answer to the mothering experiment is most often found when we are on our knees as well.
Spunky
Comment by spunkyhomeschool (June 27, 2005 @ 9:26 pm )
Amy,
My suggestion to you as a former doer of science experiments is to just give up. We have rarely had a science experiment work. The fish we dissected didn’t even have a brain. We named him “Abby Normal.”
It has been YEARS since I have allowed any form of elementary science experiment in the house. What goes on behind my back with frogs is fine.
Comment by Cindy (June 28, 2005 @ 9:20 am )
Cindy, “Abby Normal?” hahahaha … that is stinkin’ funny!
I will agree that Field Trip science experiments (like our recent homeschool group’s shark dissection) tends to be much better, BUT we have had successful simple experiments from Mudpies to Magnets
One of our biggest flops was our paper mache EARTHS. NOTE: Balloon forms make EGG-SHAPED earths. And although adults could probably expend an extreme amount of energy on constructing an earth/egg theological discussion … my kids were none too thrilled. I considered making them into pinatas and beating them senseless for Reeses Peanut Butter cups, but then decided not to do so when I came to my senses and realized that I value nap-time and cocoa and sugar alleviates all hopes for peaceful naps.
Comment by Heather L. Sanders (June 28, 2005 @ 9:50 am )
I’m just hoping there’s exponential credit for the woman being “saved through child bearing” and homeschooling to boot!
Comment by Carrie (June 30, 2005 @ 5:04 pm )