Fads and today’s news
Friday, Oct 28, 2005
When my children were smaller, it was my habit to turn on the radio and flip through FM stations looking for a good tune. When my son mimicked, “Who-let-the-dogs-out?” at the ripe age of three, I knew it was time to rid my life of the vestiges of pop culture that I clinged to. I had sponges strapped into carseats behind me.
In my defense, I want to say that I never purposely listened to the above mentioned song.
I was reminded of this because of a phone call I received yesterday from a market research company. In the past I have participated in various focus groups because I like to make a quick buck make sure that my trading is profitable. So the company called again, wanting people “in the younger age group” to participate in a study on local radio stations. She asked what stations I listened to. I replied, “540 and 1350,” to which she answered, “Those aren’t radio stations.” Then I said, “They would be on the AM frequency.”
Right. I know. Talk radio is for the old folks.
Now, don’t think the hypocrisy is beyond me, as I realize that Rush Limbaugh can be worse than letting some dogs out. But that’s why I ditched Dr. Laura and I only listen to Rush when he’s not cussing.
Today, as I was listening to the indictment against “Scooter” Libby, I reflected on the fact that this information was not going to help me this week or next year. There are some things worth paying attention to, but this is not one of them. I was filling my mind with idle chatter, wasting an opportunity to fill it with better things. I plan to make better choices tomorrow.
Let me explain another way. When the uproar in the Christian community transpired regarding the release of the latest Harry Potter book, my husband remarked, “It’s a fad and that’s a good enough reason to reject it.” If the Harry Potter books are truly “great works of fiction,” then they will stand the test of time and still be great in, say, twenty years. So then, I can buy it in paperback and save a few bucks. In the meantime, I have yet to scratch the surface of truly outstanding literature, and so, it makes better sense to fill my time reading that which is proven to be worthwhile.
Truly, if the public deems something worthy, that is reason enough to give it a triple-take. I’ve yet to witness when the mass public has been right when calling a thing “good.”
I want my kids to know that when they look back on their childhoods and wonder why there were no pictures of them wearing oversized glasses and a wizard hat, that there was a deliberate reason behind it. I trust they’ll thank me.
If it turns out that I’m wrong, I’ll give them the twenty dollars for a wizard hat to soothe the scars.
8 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Oh, I’m laughing.
Sometimes we just gotta ask, “What is it we’re really missing here.?” Sometimes my kids feel left out because they aren’t up on all the fads, but even they, after a while realized that we just don’t want to spend that much energy on being “with-it”. My son bugged me and bugged me to see Star Wars because all the other fellows at church were talking over Star Wars. So, finally, we did watch it as a family. By that time, his friends were on to something else, and he saw for himself what an endless bouncing ball it is. So we missed out on HP. But we are very much enjoying reading “Little Britches” as a family, and that is a book that has stood the test of time!
Comment by kerri (October 29, 2005 @ 12:27 am )
Once a research gal called and wanted to get my son’s opinion about different trading cards. It was SO FUNNY. Nearly every response out of him was, “I don’t play with those,” and when he was completely clueless about what she was even talking about, I’d jump in and tell her that he doesn’t trade Pokemon (etc.) cards. Somehow I don’t think we helped with her research much.
And I hear ya about the Libby indictment helping you. My dh asked me what I knew about the Harriet Miers thing, and I said, “Ya know, I really don’t know much. I have other things [like sick babies] preoccupying my thoughts this week, so I haven’t paid attention to much news at all.” He said, “Yeah, me either.” LOL.
Comment by Keer (October 29, 2005 @ 2:35 am )
Hey, I have no clue about any indictment either. In fact, it seems I have no clue about lots of things. HP, however, I read the first one–borrowed from the library–hated it. So we are not HP fans! LOL
Star Wars on the other hand….
Comment by Lyn (October 29, 2005 @ 9:47 pm )
AAAAAAAaaaahhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
That was one funny post!
From a former Dr. Laura and Rush listener, who has also turned off the dial for the very same reason…
(I now prefer Silence, actually, probably due to its extremely rare appearance here in my humble abode)…
Comment by Molly (October 30, 2005 @ 2:58 am )
I’m late to this discussion, but I wholeheartedly concur. It reminded me when a marketer called with a survey about cereal consumption. I didn’t even recognize half of the cereals she asked about. She then asked to talk to a child in my household under twelve. On a lark I asked my 11 yr son if he wanted to talk to this lady. He shrugged and took the phone. She was astonished that he was unfamiliar with choco-graham-flakes. She finished the conversation by observing that we must not watch too much TV.
Comment by Carol in Oregon (November 1, 2005 @ 1:40 pm )
Hi Amy - long time no comment.
I’m even later to the discussion…I’m curious - what do you not like about Dr. Laura? If I’m on a road trip I listen and I thought that this would be the sort of thing that you would like. Personally, I don’t like her holier-than-thou negative attitude, but I thought you might like her because she is a big advocate of mothers staying at home with their children.
Comment by Alice (November 17, 2005 @ 1:52 am )
Hi Alice! Long time, no talk! Dr. Laura has a potty mouth…
that we don’t want our littles mimicking. While Dr. Laura advocates a few good things (like mothers raising their own children), her basis for recommending such things is some ambiguous morality, not the Word of God.
Like we were discussing before on your site, if there is no standard of truth (the Bible), how does she go about saying that her way is the moral way? What if I feel that my way is the moral way (dumping them in daycare)? Now here, she would point to research to defend her position-and that is fine, but the reason that I stay home with my kids is because the Bible tells me that I am responsible for their nurture, not because a group of scientists finally uncovered that mothers are best for their children.
While Dr. Laura says a lot of good things, she rejects the standard of Truth, the Bible.
Hope that makes sense, Alice, and nice talking to you again. I’ve been following some of the conversation at EU and your site, but Ron, Greg, and Rev. Ed usually sum up some of my thoughts. (Greg especially…
)
Comment by Amy (November 17, 2005 @ 1:17 pm )
Thanks Amy!
Comment by Alice (November 19, 2005 @ 3:14 pm )